🔒 Replace weak password hashing with password_hash() - #38
Conversation
Co-authored-by: tsainez <13399044+tsainez@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
🎯 What: Fixed weak password hashing by replacing
⚠️ Risk: The previous implementation used an outdated hashing function with a statically hardcoded salt, creating deterministic and completely insecure hashes vulnerable to rapid cracking.
crypt()withpassword_hash().🛡️ Solution: Replaced
crypt()with modernpassword_hash()utilizingPASSWORD_DEFAULTto ensure strong algorithm usage and secure, automatic salt generation.PR created automatically by Jules for task 8073517699163185419 started by @tsainez